November 7, 2009 6:44 am

 
Vocabulary and Need to Know Items
Vocabulary Definition
IFL: Institute for learning http://ifl.lrdc.pitt.edu/ifl/index.php?section=pol
LearningWalk: The LearningWalk is the Institute for Learning's signature tool for getting smarter about teaching and learning. The LearningWalk is an organized visit through a school's halls and classrooms using the Principles of Learning to focus on the instructional core. It incorporates distinct practices and skills. The organization of a LearningWalk, in particular the composition of participants, will vary according to the learning needs of the participants and/or of the school staff. LearningWalks may be led by administrators or by teacher leaders. During LearningWalks, participants spend five to ten minutes in each of several classrooms looking at student work and classroom artifacts, and talking with students and teachers. One of the hallmarks of the LearningWalk is that observation of the instructional core is filtered through the eyes and voices of students. By means of these observations, walkers collect evidence about learning as well as teaching, about how the teacher's work impacts student learning. Between classroom visits, participants gather in the hall to discuss what they learned in the last room by making factual statements and generating questions they may have about what they observed which, if asked of teachers, might stimulate them to think more deeply about practice. At the end of the LearningWalk, participants work with the leader of the walk to refine observations and questions, to look for patterns within the school, and to think about next steps for the school, particularly next steps for professional development.
PLC-Professional Learning Community: Professional learning communities are groups of like-minded educators who have a common mission to accomplish through agreed upon objectives measured by agreed upon evaluations or assessments.
PoL -Principles of Learning: 1)      Effort Based Intelligence

a.       An effort-based school replaces the assumption that aptitude determines what and how much students learn with the assumption that sustained and directed effort can yield high achievement for all students. Everything is organized to evoke and support this effort, to send the message that effort is expected and that tough problems yield to sustained work. High minimum standards are set and assessments are geared to the standards. All students are taught a rigorous curriculum, matched to the standards, along with as much time and expert instruction as they need to meet or exceed expectations.

2)      Rigor

a.       Thinking and problem solving will be the "new basics" of the 21st century. But the common idea that we can teach thinking without a solid foundation of knowledge must be abandoned. So must the idea that we can teach knowledge without engaging students in thinking. Knowledge and thinking are intimately joined. This implies a curriculum organized around major concepts that students are expected to know deeply. Teaching must engage students in active reasoning about these concepts. In every subject, at every grade level, instruction and learning must include commitment to a knowledge core, high thinking demand, and active use of knowledge.

3)      Accountable Talk

a.       Talking with others about ideas and work is fundamental to learning. But not all talk sustains learning. For classroom talk to promote learning it must be accountabled appropriate knowledge, and to rigorous thinking. It puts forth and demands knowledge that is accurate and relevant to the issue under discussion. Accountable talk uses evidence appropriate to the discipline (e.g., proofs in mathematics, data from investigations in science, textual details in literature, documentary sources in history) and follows established norms of good reasoning. Teachers should intentionally create the norms and skills of accountable talk in their classrooms.

4)      Fair and Credible Evaluation

a.       If we expect students to put forth sustained effort over time, we need to use assessments that students find fair; and that parents, community, and employers find credible. Fair evaluations are ones that students can prepare for: therefore, tests, exams and classroom assessments results of their learning efforts. Assessments that meet these criteria provide parents, colleges, and employers with credible evaluations of what individual students know and can do.

5)      Recognition of accomplishment

a.       If we expect students to put forth and sustain high levels of effort, we need to motivate them by regularly recognizing their accomplishments. Clear recognition of authentic accomplishment is a hallmark of an effort-based school. This recognition can take the form of celebrations of work that meets standards or intermediate progress benchmarks en route to the standards. Progress points should be articulated so that, regardless of entering performance level, every student can meet real accomplishment criteria often enough to be recognized frequently. Recognition of accomplishment can be tied to opportunity to participate in events that matter to students and their families. Student accomplishment is also recognized when student performance on standards-based assessments is related to opportunities at work and in higher education.

6)      Clear Expectations

a.       If we expect all students to achieve at high levels, then we need to define explicitly what we expect students to learn. These expectations need to be communicated clearly in ways that get them "into the heads" of school professionals, parents, the community and, above all, students themselves. Descriptive criteria and models of work that meets standards should be publicly displayed, and students should refer to these displays to help them analyze and discuss their work. With visible accomplishment targets to aim toward at each stage of learning, students can participate in evaluating their own work and setting goals for their own effort.

7)      Socializing Intelligence

a.       Intelligence is much more than an innate ability to think quickly and stockpile bits of knowledge. Intelligence is a set of problem-solving and reasoning capabilities along with the habits of mind that lead one to use those capabilities regularly. Intelligence is equally a set of beliefs about one's right and obligation to understand and make sense of the world, and one's capacity to figure things out over time. Intelligent habits of mind are learned through the daily expectations placed on the learner. By calling on students to use the skills of intelligent thinking--and by holding them responsible for doing so--educators can "teach" intelligence. This is what teachers normally do with students they expect much from; it should be standard practice with all students.

8)       Self management of learning

a.       If students are going to be responsible for the quality of their thinking and learning, they need to develop--and regularly use--an array of self-monitoring and self-management strategies. These metacognitive skills include noticing when one doesn't understand something and taking steps to remedy the situation, as well as formulating questions and inquiries that let one explore deep levels of meaning. Students also manage their own learning by evaluating the feedback they get from others; bringing their background knowledge to bear on new learning; anticipating learning difficulties and apportioning their time accordingly; and judging their progress toward a learning goal. These are strategies that good learners use spontaneously and all students can learn through appropriate instruction and socialization. Learning environments should be designed to model and encourage the regular use of self-management strategies.

9)      Learning as Apprenticeship

a.       For many centuries most people learned by working alongside an expert who modeled skilled practice and guided novices as they created authentic products or performances for interested and critical audiences. This kind of apprenticeship allowed learners to acquire complex interdisciplinary knowledge, practical abilities, and appropriate forms of social behavior. Much of the power of apprenticeship learning can be brought into schooling by organizing learning environments so that complex thinking is modeled and analyzed, and by providing mentoring and coaching as students undertake extended projects and develop presentations of finished work, both in and beyond the classroom.

Problem Based Learning: A well defined outcome and ill-defined task. Problem based learning for the purposes here is the use of a problem statement the both guides the learning and any resultant activities to explore the topic. Generally, problem based learning is context rich but textually and informationally impoverished. The focus of the learning is on individual and groups to (a) clearly identify what information they need to solve the problem and (b) identify suitable resources and sources of information.
Project Based Learning: A well defined outcome and ill-defined task. Project based learning for the purposes here is the use of a project that often results in the emergence of various learning outcomes in addition to the ones anticipated. The learning is dynamic as students use various processes and methods to explore the project. The project is generally information rich but directions are kept to a minimum. The richness of the information is often directly related to the quality of the learning and level of student engagement. The information is often multifaceted and includes background information, graphs, pictures, specifications, generalized , and specific outcome expectations, narrative, an in many cases the formative and summative expectations.
SEs – Student Expectations: The focus is on the verbs contained in the objectives.
SIOP: Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol http://www.siopinstitute.net/ The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) Model (Echevarria, Vogt & Short, 2000) was developed to provide teachers with a well articulated, practical model of sheltered instruction. The intent of the model is to facilitate high quality instruction for English Learners in content area teaching. The SIOP Model is based on current knowledge and research-based practices for promoting learning with all students, especially English Learners (ELs). Critical features of high quality instruction for ELs are embedded within the SIOP Model. The SIOP Model can be viewed as an umbrella under which other programs developed for improving instruction can reside. Administrators and teachers alike are bombarded with new approaches to instruction, reform efforts, and practices that sometimes seem to be in competition with one another. Often what is lacking in schools is coherence, or a plan for pulling together sound practices (Goldenberg, 2004). The SIOP Model is not another “add on” program but rather it is a framework that can bring together a school’s instructional program by organizing methods and techniques, and ensuring that effective practices are implemented - and can be quantified.
SLC- Small Learning Community: These are formed by ensuring that all the content area teachers (mathematics, science, social studies, reading/language arts) teach the same students and have common planning, behavior management plans, and common performance expectations. SLC affords teachers the opportunity to become better acquainted with students and improves communication among teachers about student progress on common issues.
TAKS-Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: The state of Texas’ minimal skills test designed to assess the state’s curriculum objectives.
TEKS- Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills: The state of Texas’ educational objectives that all students should know by grade level and subject.
 
Aggie-STEM News

Welcome to the new Aggie-STEM project portal. If you have any comments about our site please use the form below. Thank you for your interest. 

Important Links

New Book, coming soon
How to order the PBL book?
PBL Book is published!
The Effects of Project Based Learning
Trainer of Trainers Workshop
Welcome to our newest partner: Agile Mind
More links »

Latest Papers

Comprehensive School Reform and Achievement: A Meta-Analyis
summary by Michael Muzheve
Effects of Sample Size on Effect Size in Systematic Reviews in Education
summary by Michael Muzheve
Effective Programs in Middle and High School Mathematics: A Best-Evidence Synthesis
summary by Michael Muzheve
More papers »

Latest Video


STEM Relevance
More videos »
 
     
 
© 2009 All rights reserved
College of Education & Human Development
Texas A&M University , College Station, Texas 77843